Even during the war, Nehru was unequivocal: “There is no sense or meaning in the Chinese offer to withdraw twenty kilometres from what they call ‘line of actual control’. The Line of Actual Control (LAC) – the line that separates Indian and Chinese troops since 1962 – generally runs along the land except for the width of Pangong Tso. Army vehicles at the Line of Actual Control. Apparently, New Delhi’s claim with regard to the LAC in the western sector was not acceptable to the Chinese. Your One-Stop Solution for All round UPSC Civil Service Exam Preparations. International Relations | Mains Paper 2: Bilateral, Regional and Global Groupings and agreements involving India Post date June 1, 2020; Post date The Hindu; Note4Students. Because the nature of the terrain, deployment, and infrastructure and connectivity asymmetries in the border areas continue to be so starkly in China’s favour that it is clear that the Chinese are in no hurry to settle the boundary question. Copyright@IAS Abhiyan-2020 I All Rights Reserved. India’s objection, as described by Menon, was that the Chinese line “was a disconnected series of points on a map that could be joined up in many ways; the line should omit gains from aggression in 1962 and therefore should be based on the actual position on September 8, 1962 before the Chinese attack; and the vagueness of the Chinese definition left it open for China to continue its creeping attempt to change facts on the ground by military force”. We are here to make sure students get what they deserve. Independent India was transferred the treaties from the British, and while the Shimla Agreement on the McMahon Line was signed by British India, Aksai Chin in Ladakh province of the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir was not part of British India, although it was a part of the British Empire. By disregarding the map, China is not bound in any way by New Delhi’s perception of the LAC, and therefore does not have to limit liberty of action. What was India’s response to China’s designation of the LAC? Over 500,000 candidates apply each year and compete for less than a thousand seats. The LAC refers to territory under the effective control of each side, not to their entire territorial claim. Latest Current Affairs in about Line of Actual Control. And this is exactly what Raj Malhotra envisioned when he founded this one of the best institute for IAS Coaching alongside Mr. Jagpal Dhanoa(IPS). Explain. Your email address will not be published. In hindsight, it is obvious that Mr. Wang didn’t think the map was in Chinese interests. During the Doklam crisis in 2017, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson urged India to abide by the “1959 LAC”. Line of Actual Control by Team NEXT IAS June 3, 2020 June 3, 2020 In News- The Indian and Chinese Army has been engaged in a tense stand-off since the start of May along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) , in the Himalayan region of Ladakh, which has the potential to … Here’s how. It is concurrent with the Chinese Aksai Chin claim line. India considers Johnson Line as a correct, rightful national border with China, while on the other hand, China considers the McDonald Line as the correct border with India. They see that the cost to India in keeping this question open suits them more than settling the issue. Here, it runs through water. UPSC Prelims 2020 Question Paper With Answer Key. Contact Us for more info. The specification of this LAC as the starting point and the central focus has made several key stipulations and articles of the four agreements effectively inoperable for more than a quarter of a century. It is a boundary between China and India. He provided no reason for his action. From UPSC perspective, the following things are important : Prelims level : Ladakh Region, Pangong Lake. How is the LAC different from the Line of Control with Pakistan? (Express Archive) The unprecedented high levels of tension at multiple locations in eastern Ladakh on the disputed India-China border, where Chinese soldiers have moved into Indian territory across the Line of Actual Control (LAC), has raised questions about the Chinese motives for this action. India formally accepted the concept of the LAC in 1993 and the two sides signed the Agreement to Maintain Peace and Tranquillity at the LAC. The line in the middle sector is the least controversial but for the precise alignment to be followed in the Barahoti plains. The major disagreements are in the western sector where the LAC emerged from two letters written by Chinese Prime Minister Zhou Enlai to PM. To reconcile the differences about some areas, the two countries agreed that the Joint Working Group on the border issue would take up the task of clarifying the alignment of the LAC. Required fields are marked *. QUESTION – With several rounds of discussions over the boundary question between the plenipotentiaries of India and China, the issue of LAC does not seem to be moving forward in the right direction. LINE OF ACTUAL CONTROL (LAC): CHINA UPS THE ANTE. Article XII of the 1996 agreement, for instance, says, “. LAC – the premise of all boundary agreements –. The term is said to have been used by Zhou Enlai in a 1959 letter to Jawaharlal Nehru. Source: IE The LAC is the demarcation that separates Indian-controlled territory from Chinese-controlled … After the 1962 War, the Chinese claimed they had withdrawn to 20 km behind the LAC of November 1959. Unfortunately, these are deeply flawed agreements and make the quest for settlement of the boundary question at best a strategic illusion and at worst a cynical diplomatic parlour trick. At the heart of India’s and China’s continued inability to make meaningful progress on the boundary issue (LAC) are four agreements — signed in September 1993, November 1996, April 2005 and October 2013 — between the two countries. This map, as is officially used till date, formed the basis of dealings with China, eventually leading to the 1962 War. But why are these claim lines controversial in Ladakh? BYJU'S IAS Recommended for you The second is what the Chinese think they effectively control, which is well south of the line they were positioned at in 1993. Prelims-and-Mains IAS Comprehensive Course, According to the 1993 agreement (on the maintenance of peace and tranquility along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the India-China border areas), “, Further, both the 1993 and the 1996 agreement (. Both sides have marked their areas announcing which side belongs to which country. A phantom called the ‘Line of Actual Control’ (LAC) At the heart of India’s and China’s continued inability to make meaningful progress on the boundary issue (LAC) are four agreements — signed in September 1993, November 1996, April 2005 and October 2013 — between the two countries. The first, in July 1948, had two maps: one had no boundary shown in the western sector, only a partial colour wash; the second one extended the colour wash in yellow to the entire state of J&K, but mentioned “boundary undefined”. Crisp news summaries and articles on current events about Line of Actual Control for IBPS, Banking, UPSC, Civil services.

How To Be A Good Moderator In A Conference, Leesa Promo Code Podcast, Peach Mario Bros, Grammar School Near Me, 2-methylbutane Newman Projection, Staff Accountant Interview Questions And Answers, Carrot Fruit Or Vegetable, Computer Science Syllabus, Blue Mikey Review,