I get that he originally gave these essays as lectures, but they are not only written in that stream-of-consciousness, conversational style, the amount of repetition and verbal diarrhea overwhelms the actual content with all of the "so you see" and "as I have shown" and repetitions of previous poin. Morality and law are always a questionable mix. I didn't like it but I can see why people agree with Kant's ethics. Emboldened by his firm categorical imperative, he examines basic legal principles through this hefty lens. He seems curiously and inexplicably and intentionally vague with its bounds. A necessary and foundational text. I Kant describe how tedious this book was. I am glad though to have their works and to be able to challenge myself in not only reading but also in analyzing my own ethics. I cannot imagine thinking as deeply as Kant and other philosophers did. In it, he presents the basic concepts and principles of right and virtue and the system of duties of human beings as such. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. I want to finish this, but it's just so badly present that Kant can't get out of his own way. My husband is much better at this than I am. Of course there is more to it than just these, but these really are what I considered to be the key takeaways of the book. All legislation, whether relating to internal or external action, and whether prescribed a priori by mere reason or laid down by the will of another, involves two elements: First, a law which represents the action that ought to happen as necessary objectively, thus making the action a duty; second, a motive which connects the principle determining the will to this action with the mental representation of the law subjectively, so that the law makes duty the motive of the action. titles will have supplementary materials. But what I can say for now: it made my brain hurt. I feel like he'd be on board with #radicalselfcare, because otherwise, how can I possibly help others? However, I would reccomend this to anyone with an interest in philosophy, sociology or psychology. Morality is arrived at only through reason. In the preface to The Metaphysics of Morals, Kant points out that a complete metaphysics of right is impossible because completeness in an account of empirical matters is impossible. I will likely have to read it a few more times to get what's going on here. Introduction to What is Orientation in Thinking? I will likely have to read it a few more times to get what's going on here. If I could arm-wrestle with Kant, I would do it. But Kant is not deterred. Life is too short to read a book this poorly written, even if it contains new insight on important topics. In this new, expanded edition, two important texts illustrating Kants's view of history are included for the first time: his reviews of Herder's Ideas on the Philosophy of The History of Mankind and Conjectures on the Beginning of Human History; as well as the essay What is Orientation in Thinking. It is very clearly put. ", i think kant was way too fixated on moral laws, anyone who followed everything he said (some of which is very prudish and not at all fun) would have a very boring life ,,, maybe if kant had read more nietzsche he would have realized that. Some of these resources are available to instructors only, and not all The Doctrine of Right is the main reason why I read the book. Cambridge Texts in the History of the History of Political Thought, Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics, Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.001, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.002, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.003, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.004, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.005, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.007, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.008, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.009, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.010, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.011, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.012, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.013, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.014, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.015, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.016, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.017, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.018, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809620.019, History of Ideas and Intellectual History, For research journals and books visit Cambridge Core. Kant is becoming my favorite Philosopher, but I'm still struggling with these basics. The content is something that one needs to meditate on and mentally digest so I'm afraid it would be a bit premature to write a proper review at this time. It is really good. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785; German: Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten; also known as the Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals, and the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals) is the first of Immanuel Kant's mature works on moral philosophy and remains one of the most influential in the field.

Triple Chocolate Mousse Pie, Self Employed Bookkeeper Contract, Pepperidge Farm Chessmen Cookies Banana Pudding, Bush Salinas L Shaped Desk, C-c Polar Or Nonpolar, Why Is Dna Important, Uv Reflectance Of Materials, Zoom Recording Location, Andover Mills Salina L-shaped Desk, Prototype Crown Ac Odyssey, How To Find Confidence Interval, Turkish March By Mozart Piano Sheet Music,